“You could have 0 fatalities and injuries and be included in that data,” she wrote in an email. What’s more, the center’s study relies on the FBI’s data on “active shooter” incidents, which isn’t the same as a mass shooting, said Jaclyn Schildkraut, executive director of the Rockefeller Institute of Government’s Regional Gun Violence Research Consortium in Albany, New York. “Not only are guns allowed in such places, often they are 100% certain to have someone armed, trained, paid, and under orders to protect against public mass shootings.” “That defies logic,” Webster wrote in an email, referring to military bases and other secure locations. It also excluded gang-related shootings and other mass shootings related to other major crimes. Webster and other experts also argued that the center’s study wrongly classifies places where armed officers are stationed - such as military bases - as gun-free zones. That, he argued, would make almost any public mass shooting during those years as having taken place in a gun-free zone.

Mandalay casino gun free zone